history articulated



This is an ad campaign created for The History Channel by their advertising agency, Ogilvy & Mather, in particular for the South African market. The interesting things about this campaign is that it has garnered much reaction from people around the world deeming it as “anti-American” and “offensive”.
The slogan on the top corner, however, makes me think of a bigger overall issue that plagues the world and that is that “History is Written by Winners”. I find it ironic that a television channel that is a joint venture between NBC, Disney/ABC and The Hearst Corporation to be the ones that put up such a slogan, with these particular ‘facts’ as support, on their channel campaign. Pardon me for being so skeptical of corporate infotainment, but historiographically speaking, I, for one, would consider the History Channel to be one of the hegemonic agents of interpretation of the history that is communicated to the masses. And furthermore, why is it that Ogilvy decided this would be a good campaign for South Africa, and not for the US or even any other broader market? Is there an articulation here that would be more attractive to the South African, or non-American market?
This campaign was also deemed “though provoking”; I would agree, saying definitely peculiarly so. But I guess I’m not so sure where the peculiarity of it lies in particular: the producers of it, its intended audience or the actual content.
Popularity: 15% [?]
No related posts.





So I see some smartsy ad-types have read their theories of detournement & culture jamming and are now trying to use some of these techniques to get a response by provocative juxtapositions.
I guess the secret here is that all this is public anyway – that is, there is no secret. We all know about Hiroshima and Iraq.
So who is this targeted towards? Who does it provoke? Is this just hegemonic inoculation that then is clawed back to the winner’s history in the programs? I doubt there true polyphony will even be the mainstay of the History Channel…
Quite nice images though; I just wonder what would be a truly shocking and controversial statement to make that would shock the TV-watching middle class masses … can such a thing exist anymore?